University of New England

Research impact evaluation for University of New England. Read More.

Research impact evaluation for University of New England, using the “Fields of Research” classification and the “Rating Standard” metric. This analysis includes works published from 2011 to 2019, identified by the “Automatic” assignment method, using OpenAlex author affiliations to assign outputs to an institution. Apportionment is uniformly distributed and inherited from the journal. Each column shows a 6-year moving window, labeled by the final year in the range. A minimum of 50 publications per cell is required to qualify for evaluation. For queries, please email [email protected].

University of New England Research Impact Evaluation Report

16 June 2025

Make Tomorrow Better

openknowledge.community

Executive Summary

Research impact evaluation for University of New England, using the “Fields of Research” classification and the “Rating Standard” metric. This analysis includes works published from 2011 to 2019, identified by the “Automatic” assignment method, using OpenAlex author affiliations to assign outputs to an institution. Apportionment is uniformly distributed and inherited from the journal. Each column shows a 6-year moving window, labeled by the final year in the range. A minimum of 50 publications per cell is required to qualify for evaluation.

Research Impact Evaluation

Fields of Research
2016
2017
2018
2019

Rating Standard

30 - Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences

31 - Biological Sciences

32 - Biomedical and Clinical Sciences

33 - Built Environment and Design

34 - Chemical Sciences

35 - Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services

36 - Creative Arts and Writing

37 - Earth Sciences

38 - Economics

39 - Education

40 - Engineering

41 - Environmental Sciences

42 - Health Sciences

43 - History, Heritage and Archaeology

44 - Human Society

45 - Indigenous Studies

46 - Information and Computing Sciences

47 - Language, Communication and Culture

48 - Law and Legal Studies

49 - Mathematical Sciences

50 - Philosophy and Religious Studies

51 - Physical Sciences

52 - Psychology

99 - Multidisciplinary

Data updated 07 December 2024

openknowledge.community

CRICOS Provider Code 00301J

Outputs

Title
Cited By
Year

Bias in grading: A meta-analysis of experimental research findings

John M. Malouff, Einar Thorsteinsson

Australian Journal of Education

1652016

The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia

Paul D. Meek, Guy Ballard, Peter J. S. Fleming

Australian Mammalogy

1472015

Using a three-axis accelerometer to identify and classify sheep behaviour at pasture

Flavio A. P. Alvarenga, Iara A. Borges, L. Palkovič, Jozef Rodina, V. H. Oddy...

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

1442016

Effect of exercise training on endothelial function in heart failure patients: A systematic review meta-analysis

Melissa J. Pearson, Neil A. Smart

International Journal of Cardiology

1002016

Functional electrical stimulation for chronic heart failure: A meta-analysis

Neil A. Smart, Gudrun Dieberg, Francesco Giallauria

International Journal of Cardiology

942012

Organic contaminants in bats: Trends and new issues

Sara Bayat, Fritz Geiser, Paul Kristiansen, Susan Wilson

Environment International

912013

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gudrun Dieberg, Neil A. Smart, Nicola King

International Journal of Cardiology

752016

Potential distribution of an invasive species under climate change scenarios using CLIMEX and soil drainage: A case study of Lantana camara L. in Queensland, Australia

Subhashni Taylor, Lalit Kumar

Journal of Environmental Management

722012

Quantifying the climate effects of bioenergy – Choice of reference system

Kati Koponen, Sampo Soimakallio, Keith L. Kline, Annette Cowie, Miguel Brandão

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

592017

Patient perceptions of innovative longitudinal integrated clerkships based in regional, rural and remote primary care: a qualitative study

Judith N Hudson, Patricia J Knight, Kathryn M Weston

BMC Family Practice

572012
1 / 10

Showing 1-10 of 100 outputs

Data updated 07 December 2024

Options

Legend

Rating Standard

5

Well above world standard

4

Above world standard

3

At world standard

2

Below world standard

1

Well below world standard

X

Excluded

-

No Data

E

Error

RIES DashboardsHow it WorksSupport