Southern Cross University

Research impact evaluation for Southern Cross University. Read More.

Research impact evaluation for Southern Cross University, using the “Fields of Research” classification and the “Rating Standard” metric. This analysis includes works published from 2011 to 2019, identified by the “Automatic” assignment method, using OpenAlex author affiliations to assign outputs to an institution. Apportionment is uniformly distributed and inherited from the journal. Each column shows a 6-year moving window, labeled by the final year in the range. A minimum of 50 publications per cell is required to qualify for evaluation. For queries, please email [email protected].

Southern Cross University Research Impact Evaluation Report

16 June 2025

Make Tomorrow Better

openknowledge.community

Executive Summary

Research impact evaluation for Southern Cross University, using the “Fields of Research” classification and the “Rating Standard” metric. This analysis includes works published from 2011 to 2019, identified by the “Automatic” assignment method, using OpenAlex author affiliations to assign outputs to an institution. Apportionment is uniformly distributed and inherited from the journal. Each column shows a 6-year moving window, labeled by the final year in the range. A minimum of 50 publications per cell is required to qualify for evaluation.

Research Impact Evaluation

Fields of Research
2016
2017
2018
2019

Rating Standard

30 - Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences

31 - Biological Sciences

32 - Biomedical and Clinical Sciences

33 - Built Environment and Design

34 - Chemical Sciences

35 - Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services

36 - Creative Arts and Writing

37 - Earth Sciences

38 - Economics

39 - Education

40 - Engineering

41 - Environmental Sciences

42 - Health Sciences

43 - History, Heritage and Archaeology

44 - Human Society

45 - Indigenous Studies

46 - Information and Computing Sciences

47 - Language, Communication and Culture

48 - Law and Legal Studies

49 - Mathematical Sciences

50 - Philosophy and Religious Studies

51 - Physical Sciences

52 - Psychology

99 - Multidisciplinary

Data updated 07 December 2024

openknowledge.community

CRICOS Provider Code 00301J

Outputs

Title
Cited By
Year

A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils

Sana Khalid, Muhammad Shahid, Nabeel Khan Niazi, Behzad Murtaza, Irshad Bibi...

Journal of Geochemical Exploration

10862016

The future of Blue Carbon science

Peter I. Macreadie, Andrea Antón, John A. Raven, Nicola Beaumont, Rod M. Connolly...

Nature Communications

6712019

Progress in Myrtaceae genetics and genomics: Eucalyptus as the pivotal genus

Dário Grattapaglia, René E. Vaillancourt, Mervyn Shepherd, Bala R Thumma, William J. Foley...

Tree Genetics & Genomes

2532012

Professional Help-Seeking for Gambling Problems: Awareness, Barriers and Motivators for Treatment

Sally Gainsbury, Nerilee Hing, Niko Suhonen

Journal of Gambling Studies

1902013

A neural network-based local rainfall prediction system using meteorological data on the Internet: A case study using data from the Japan Meteorological Agency

Tomoaki Kashiwao, Koichi Nakayama, Shin Ando, Kenji Ikeda, Moonyong Lee...

Applied Soft Computing

1322017

Measuring reliability of hybrid photovoltaic-wind energy systems: A new indicator

Luceny Guzmán Acuña, Ricardo Vásquez Padilla, Alcides Santander-Mercado

Renewable Energy

952017

Innovation and business performance of SMEs: the case of Dubai

Yahya Al-Ansari, Simon Pervan, Jun Xu

Education Business and Society Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues

912013

Importance of Iron Complexation for Fenton-Mediated Hydroxyl Radical Production at Circumneutral pH

Christopher J. Miller, Andrew L. Rose, T. David Waite

Frontiers in Marine Science

902016

Biological Importance of Cotton By-Products Relative to Chemical Constituents of the Cotton Plant

Mary A. Egbuta, Shane McIntosh, Daniel Le Waters, Tony Vancov, Lei Liu

Molecules

862017

Non-destructive concrete strength evaluation using smart piezoelectric transducer—a comparative study

Yee Yan Lim, Kok Zee Kwong, Willey Yun Hsien Liew, Chee Kiong Soh

Smart Materials and Structures

842016
1 / 10

Showing 1-10 of 100 outputs

Data updated 07 December 2024

Options

Legend

Rating Standard

5

Well above world standard

4

Above world standard

3

At world standard

2

Below world standard

1

Well below world standard

X

Excluded

-

No Data

E

Error

RIES DashboardsHow it WorksSupport