Australian Catholic University

Research impact evaluation for Australian Catholic University. Read More.

Research impact evaluation for Australian Catholic University, using the “Fields of Research” classification and the “Rating Standard” metric. This analysis includes works published from 2011 to 2019, identified by the “Automatic” assignment method, using OpenAlex author affiliations to assign outputs to an institution. Apportionment is uniformly distributed and inherited from the journal. Each column shows a 6-year moving window, labeled by the final year in the range. A minimum of 50 publications per cell is required to qualify for evaluation. For queries, please email [email protected].

Australian Catholic University Research Impact Evaluation Report

16 June 2025

Make Tomorrow Better

openknowledge.community

Executive Summary

Research impact evaluation for Australian Catholic University, using the “Fields of Research” classification and the “Rating Standard” metric. This analysis includes works published from 2011 to 2019, identified by the “Automatic” assignment method, using OpenAlex author affiliations to assign outputs to an institution. Apportionment is uniformly distributed and inherited from the journal. Each column shows a 6-year moving window, labeled by the final year in the range. A minimum of 50 publications per cell is required to qualify for evaluation.

Research Impact Evaluation

Fields of Research
2016
2017
2018
2019

Rating Standard

30 - Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences

31 - Biological Sciences

32 - Biomedical and Clinical Sciences

33 - Built Environment and Design

34 - Chemical Sciences

35 - Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services

36 - Creative Arts and Writing

37 - Earth Sciences

38 - Economics

39 - Education

40 - Engineering

41 - Environmental Sciences

42 - Health Sciences

43 - History, Heritage and Archaeology

44 - Human Society

45 - Indigenous Studies

46 - Information and Computing Sciences

47 - Language, Communication and Culture

48 - Law and Legal Studies

49 - Mathematical Sciences

50 - Philosophy and Religious Studies

51 - Physical Sciences

52 - Psychology

99 - Multidisciplinary

Data updated 07 December 2024

openknowledge.community

CRICOS Provider Code 00301J

Outputs

Title
Cited By
Year

Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability

Christine Imms, Mats Granlund, Peter H. Wilson, Bert Steenbergen, Peter Rosenbaum...

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

4372016

Nursing and aggression in the workplace: a systematic review

Karen‐Leigh Edward, Karen Ousey, Philip Warelow, Steve Lui

British Journal of Nursing

2382014

Conflicting Guidelines on Young Children's Screen Time and Use of Digital Technology Create Policy and Practice Dilemmas

Leon Straker, Juliana Zabatiero, Susan Danby, Karen Thorpe, Susan Edwards

The Journal of Pediatrics

1232018

Physiologic Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Infants With Bronchiolitis

Judith Hough, T. Pham, Andreas Schibler

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

1172014

Enhanced Endurance Performance by Periodization of Carbohydrate Intake

Laurie-Anne Marquet, Jeanick Brisswalter, Julien Louis, Eve Tiollier, Louise M. Burke...

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

1162016

From Social Exclusion to Supported Inclusion: Adults with Intellectual Disability Discuss Their Lived Experiences of a Structured Social Group

Nathan J. Wilson, Hayden Jaques, Amanda Johnson, Michelle Brotherton

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

992016

Bidirectional associations between mothers’ feeding practices and child eating behaviours

Elena Jansen, Kate Williams, Kimberley M. Mallan, Jan M. Nicholson, Lynne Daniels

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

972018

Characteristics impacting on session rating of perceived exertion training load in Australian footballers

Tania F. Gallo, Stuart J. Cormack, Tim J. Gabbett, Morgan Williams, Christian Lorenzen

Journal of Sports Sciences

902014

Validity of Walk Score® as a measure of neighborhood walkability in Japan

Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Takemi Sugiyama, Tomoya Hanibuchi, Ai Shibata, Kaori Ishii...

Preventive Medicine Reports

852018

Statistical modelling for recurrent events: an application to sports injuries

Shahid Ullah, Tim J. Gabbett, Caroline F. Finch

British Journal of Sports Medicine

782012
1 / 10

Showing 1-10 of 100 outputs

Data updated 07 December 2024

Options

Legend

Rating Standard

5

Well above world standard

4

Above world standard

3

At world standard

2

Below world standard

1

Well below world standard

X

Excluded

-

No Data

E

Error

RIES DashboardsHow it WorksSupport